Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 6, 1933No. 23471PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREWS, 7.

This is an appeal by the protestee from a judgment of the Court of Tax Review sustaining a protest of taxes for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1931.

The first issue presented involves an appropriation for the purpose of paying per diem of the county commissioners of Grant county for overseeing road and bridge work in the sum of $1,850. The entire amount was stricken by the Court of Tax Review.

An examination of the statutes of Oklahoma discloses a legislative policy to provide for compensation for county commissioners in addition to the compensation fixed by the salary act. Such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Caddo County v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sinclair Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. St. Louis-S. F. R. v. Choctaw County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Morley v. State Ex Rel. Board of Ed.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Jamison v. Admiralty Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Opinion No. 68-196 (1968) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API