Legal Opinion
Morley v. State Ex Rel. Board of Ed.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 11, 1934No. 25908PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.
This action in mandamus was commenced in the district court of Tulsa county on the 14th day of September, 1934, by the defendant in error, the state of Oklahoma, on the relation of the board of education of the city of Tulsa, as plaintiff. The plaintiffs in error, Raisa F. Morley, Merritt J. Glass, and G. Ed Warren, as the excise board of Tulsa county, Dan Rowe, as county assessor of Tulsa county, Okla., A. L. Carmichael, as county treasurer of Tulsa county, L. D. Souter, as assessor of Osage county, Fred Newberry, as county -clerk of Osage county, and L. L. Houston, as county treasurer of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Board of Ed. v. MorleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- In Re MonsellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- State Ex Rel. v. Excise Board of Payne CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- St. Louis-S. F. R. v. Choctaw County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Kurn v. HelmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Branch v. Oklahoma County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Excise Board of Oklahoma County v. Continental OilSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Pontotoc County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.