Legal Opinion
Boyd v. City and County of San Francisco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 7, 2009No. 19-15159PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-Appellants Marylon Marie Boyd, Isabel Gonzales, and Kanani Boyd (the Boyd Family), who are the mother and daughters of Cammerin Boyd (Cammerin), appeal the district court’s judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees, the City and County of San Francisco and police officers James O’Malley and Timothy Paine (collectively, San Francisco). The Boyd Family alleges that the district court’s erroneous admission of irrelevant and prejudicial evidence tainted the jury’s verdict such that reversal is warranted. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- McCollough v. Johnson, Rodenburg & Lauinger, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- C. B. v. City of SonoraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Estate of Manuel Diaz v. City of AnaheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.