Legal Opinion
Haight v. City of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 1991No. D011387PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, J.
William R. Haight appeals from the final judgment denying his petition for writ of mandate to direct the City of San Diego and its law enforcement officers (collectively City) to remove and destroy the separation report from his police officer personnel records or grant him an administrative hearing on the validity of derogatory allegations contained in the report. We shall conclude the trial court properly denied his request for mandamus relief because Haight had no liberty or property interest falling under Fourteenth Amendment protection at the time of City’s actions.
Factu…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Marc A. Stretten v. Wadsworth Veterans HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Dunn v. MUNICIPAL COURT FOR EUREKA JUDICIAL DISTRICTCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Lubey v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Murden v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego SectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Laraway v. Pasadena Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Caloca v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Warmington Old Town Associates, L.P. v. Tustin Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Otto v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.