Legal Opinion
Murden v. County of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 26, 1984No. Civ. 23136PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BYRNE, J. *
Petitioner James Murden appeals from a denial of his petition for writ of mandate. Petitioner alleges his “liberty interests” as protected by the California and the United States Constitutions had been violated upon his termination of employment for the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department as a deputy sheriff with the reserve forces. His termination was based upon charges of misconduct. He requested an adequate due pro cess hearing for the purpose of clearing his name. He also requested back-pay. We affirm.
Facts
In December 1981 petitioner began work as a nonpaid voluntary…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego SectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Binkley v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Richard Dorr v. County of Butte Butte County Sheriff's Department Mick Grey, Individually and as Deputy Sheriff of Butte CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Caloca v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Gilbert v. City of SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.