Legal Opinion

State v. Jenkins

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1989No. 10034PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIVINS, Chief Judge.

Sam S. Jenkins (defendant), d/b/a Customcraft Systems (Customcraft), appeals his conviction for contracting without a license. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1986 Customcraft entered into a contract with the Walkers to build and install cabinets, countertops, and vanities in their home. The contract clearly stated, “CONTRACT LABOR NOTE: ANY LABOR PERFORMED UNDER THIS CONTRACT REQUIRING A LICENSED CONTRACTOR SHALL BE PERFORMED BY HOME SERVICE CENTER LICENSE #22876 WITH SAM S. JENKINS AS QUALIFYING PARTY.” Customcraft is identified on the contract as a division of Albuquerque…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. LankfordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. ManloveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. State v. TijerinaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kreischer v. ArmijoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Crossingham Trust v. Baines (In Re Baines)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2006
  3. Little v. JacobsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Oden v. STATE, REGULATION & LICENSING DEPT.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Stokes v. TatmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API