Oden v. STATE, REGULATION & LICENSING DEPT.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROST, Chief Justice.
1. Petitioner-Appellant Michael Oden challenged the revocation of his contractor’s license and qualifying party certificate by Respondents-Appellees New Mexico Construction Industries Commission and Division (CID). Oden appealed CID’s decision to the district court, which affirmed. Finding no error, we affirm the decisions of CID and the district court.
I. FACTS
2. Oden was a licensed New Mexico contractor and a certified qualifying party subject to regulation by CID. In 1993 Greta Balderama and Lynn Chelewski, homeowners for whom Oden had built houses, filed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Farmers, Inc. v. Dal MacHine & Fabricating, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Wolfley v. Real Estate CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Poorbaugh v. MullenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Rex, Inc. v. Manufactured Hous. Comm. of NMNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Malone v. Swift Fresh Meats Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- I. T. K. v. MOUNDS PUBLIC SCHOOLSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- Gonzales v. New Mexico Board of Chiropractic ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Gonzales v. New Mexico Board of Chiropractic ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- I. T. K. v. MOUNDS PUBLIC SCHOOLSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019