Legal Opinion
Kreischer v. Armijo
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 26, 1994No. 15566PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
APODACA, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his complaint against Defendant. The complaint was dismissed in a summary judgment proceeding on the basis that Defendant was not the real party in interest. Based on the allegations raised in the complaint, we hold that the real party in interest was not Defendant individually, but Armijo Construction, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation, (the Corporation) owned by Defendant. Because Plaintiff failed to substitute the Corporation as a defendant, we affirm the trial court’s order granting summary judgment. We deem it…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Smith v. BaldwinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. NanceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. HendersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Light v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wyle v. LeesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Ettenson v. BurkeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- Bogle v. Summit Investment Co., LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Stinson v. BerryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Two Old Hippies, LLC v. Catch the Bus, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.