Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Tatman

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1990No. 18807PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTGOMERY, Justice.

On the Court’s own motion, the decision filed herein on November 19, 1990 is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted therefor.

Defendants Richard and Cathy Tatman appeal from the district court judgment in favor of plaintiff Jerry Stokes for recovery on a promissory note. We affirm.

FACTS

In June 1986, appellant Richard Tatman (Richard) and his wife Cathy Tatman (Cathy) were living on a tract of land near Hondo, in Lincoln County, New Mexico. At Cathy’s request, appellee Jerry Stokes (Stokes) went to the property one Sunday in June to discuss a proposed soil…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ross v. State Racing CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State Ex Rel. Sun Co. v. VigilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Peck v. IvesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. JenkinsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Estate of McElvenyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
  2. In re Estate of McElvenyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API