State ex rel. Rose Hill Burial Park v. Moser
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The issue presented herein is whether a writ of prohibition should issue to prevent respondent from proceeding further in the appropriation action presently pending in his court.
Generally, relator contends that prohibition will lie because there is a total want of jurisdiction on the part of respondent in the cause. Specifically, relator’s argument is two-pronged. First, relator argues that R.C. 1721.01 authorizes appropriation only where there are no graves in the area sought to be appropriated. Thus, according to relator, once the existence of such a grave is established, there is no…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. McKee v. CooperOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- State ex rel. Crebs v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- State ex rel. Bell v. BlairOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State ex rel. Susi v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority v. GuzzoOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Chillicothe Gazette, Inc. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Cosmos Broadcasting Corp. v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- State ex rel. Hardesty v. WilliamsonOhio Supreme Court · 1984