Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bell v. Blair

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1975No. 74-766PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Three general conditions must exist to support the issuance of a writ of prohibition: (1) The court or officer against whom it is sought must be about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power; (2) the exercise of such power must be unauthorized by law; and (3) it must appear that the refusal of the writ would result in injury for which there is no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State, ex rel. McKee, v. Cooper (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 65, 320 N. E. 2d 286; State, ex rel. Nolan, v. Clen Dening (1915), 93 Ohio St. 264, 112 N. E. 1029.

*97Under the facts of this case, appellant has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McKee v. CooperOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State ex rel. Woodbury v. SpitlerOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State Ex Rel. Micheel v. VamosOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State ex rel. Wentz v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Phillips v. PolcarOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Celebrezze v. Court of Common Pleas of Butler CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State ex rel. Corrigan v. GriffinOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State ex rel. Dow Chemical Co. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API