Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McKee v. Cooper

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1974No. 74-62PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I

Steen, J,.

Appellants initially raise the argument that prohibition does not lie in this case. The law is well-established in Ohio that the conditions which must exist to support the issuance of a writ of prohibition are: (1) The court or officer against whom it is sought must be about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power; (2) it must appear that the refusal of the writ would result in injury for which there is no other adequate remedy in the ordinary *68course of the law, and (3) the exercise of such power must be unauthorized by law. State, ex rel. Lehmann, v. Cmich (1970), 23 Ohio St.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. State ex rel. Lehmann v. CmichOhio Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State ex rel. Phillips v. PolcarOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State ex rel. Gyurcsik v. AngelottaOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Bobb v. MarchantOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State ex rel. McGraw v. GormanOhio Supreme Court · 1985

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API