Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority v. Guzzo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1983No. 82-1465PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

Three requirements must be satisfied before a writ of prohibition will issue: (1) the court or officer against whom it is sought must be about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power; (2) the exercise of such power must be unauthorized by law; and (3) it must appear that the refusal of the writ would result in injury for which there is no other adequate remedy at law. State, ex el. Rose Hill Burial Park, v. Moser (1982), 1 Ohio St. 3d 13, 14. Appellant submits that the accident report, the subject of this appeal, is privileged; and that appellee’s orders violate R.C. 2317.02 (A) and Civ.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Staton v. Common Pleas CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State ex rel. Stefanick v. Municipal Court of MariettaOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State ex rel. Crebs v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State ex rel. Rose Hill Burial Park v. MoserOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Racing Guild v. MorganOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State ex rel. Judson v. SpahrOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Sutton v. Stevens Painton Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Dennis v. State Farm InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. State ex rel. Lomaz v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API