Legal Opinion

Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 10, 1989No. 729PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

874 F.2d 912

57 USLW 2724, RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 7217,

10 Employee Benefits Ca 2673

Harry J. DIDUCK, individually and as a participant in the

Local 94 Insurance Trust Fund and the Local 95 Pension Fund,

and on behalf of all other persons who are, will be, or have

at any time since January 1980 been participants in the

Funds, similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

KASZYCKI & SONS CONTRACTORS, INC.; William Kaszycki; John

Senyshyn; Trump-Equitable Fifth Avenue Company; Donald J.

Trump; Donald J. Trump d/b/a the Trump Organization; the

Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States; and

the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  4. Katsaros v. CodyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. Ronald Fink v. National Savings and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Unisys Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API