Legal Opinion
Salt Lake Valley Loan & Trust Co. v. St. Joseph Land Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1928No. Nos. 4545, 4546PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHansen, J.
These two causes were argued and submitted together. In each proceeding the plaintiff seeks to foreclose a mortgage. In the main, the law questions are the same in both suits. There is no substantial conflict in the evidence as to the facts.
In the suit of the plaintiff against the defendant, St. Joseph Land Company, the facts are these:
On March 24, 1910, Harold C. Krouskoff made, executed, and delivered to one William T. Cooper a promissory note and a real estate mortgage to secure the payment of such note. The note was for the principal sum of $4,500, payable $1,000 on or before July 15,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Golinsky v. AllisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- First National Bank v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
- First National Bank v. KirkbySupreme Court of Florida · 1901
- J. W. Edgerly & Co. v. CoverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Henson v. Keet & Rountree Mercantile Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1892
3Cited by5 opinions
- Renault v. L. N. Renault & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Burguete v. G. W. Bond & Bro. Mercantile Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Reuter Organ Co. v. First Methodist Episcopal ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- John Buxton v. Diversified Resources CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Renault v. L. N. Renault & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950