Burguete v. G. W. Bond & Bro. Mercantile Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BRICE, Justice.
The first question is whether the defendant’s general manager had authority to make for it the contracts sued on in the . consolidated cases; and, if not, second, whether the defendant ratified them. The parties will be designated plaintiffs and defendant, as in the district court.
The following facts are not contested:
The defendant is a corporation which has for many years been engaged in the mercantile and ranching businesses. The plaintiffs are in the ranching business.
The duties of the president of the defendant corporation were: "To preside, when present, at all meetings of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re White's EstateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- General Paint Corporation v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Carroll-Cross Coal Co. v. Abrams Creek Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
- Horowitz v. S. Slater & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Williams v. BollingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Miera v. GeorgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
- Pankey v. Hot Springs Nat. BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Yucca Mining & Petroleum Co. v. Howard C. Phillips Oil Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- SEE-TEE MINING CORPORATION v. National Sales, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Campbell v. DohertyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.