Legal Opinion

Renault v. L. N. Renault & Sons, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1950No. Civ. 7661PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, District Judge.

In this diversity action a Pennsylvania plaintiff sought to recover from defendant, a New Jersey corporation, the principal of a twenty-seven year old unsealed demand note together with 162% interest thereon. The jury, being unable to agree to a general verdict, or to answers to any of four interrogatories submitted by the court, was discharged. Defendant moves for judgment under Rule 50(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

Under the evidence the jury would be warranted in finding:

That in 1921 defendant borrowed for corporate purposes $13,417 at six per cent…

2Cases cited101 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilt v. SmackDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Karagiannis v. ShafferDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Joseph v. Krull Wholesale Drug Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Burlington County Country Club v. Midlantic National Bank SouthNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  5. Rickenbach v. Noecker Shipbuilding Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API