Legal Opinion

Garretson Investment Co. v. Arndt

California Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1904No. L.A. No. 1457PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment entered against them upon default after demurrer overruled. The suit was brought to foreclose a mortgage made by the defendants to secure the payment of the defendant H. R. Arndt’s note to the plaintiff for the sum of six thousand dollars, etc. The judgment recites the previous appointment of a receiver in the case, and that his account rendered subsequently to the default of the defendant shows a balance in his hands of $142.30, which, it is adjudged, should be allowed as a credit on the mortgage. It is further found, or rather in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foley v. FoleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Woodward v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Brooks v. ForingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Staacke v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Baker v. VarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Casey v. DohertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Barclays Bank of Cal. v. Superior Court of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Northwestern & Pacific Hypotheek Bank v. DaltonIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  4. American Securities Co. v. Van Loben SelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Morgan v. CallahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API