Legal Opinion
Morimura, Arai & Co. v. Taback
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 18, 1929No. 18PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford
In September, 1920, Nathan Taback and Louis Taback were adjudged bankrupts, both individually and as part ners trading as Tabaclc Brothers, under an involuntary-petition in bankruptcy filed against them in the District Court for New Jersey. They seasonably applied for discharge. The firm of Morimura, Arai & Co., an objecting creditor, filed specifications of opposition on the two grounds, among others: That the bankrupts had obtained property on credit on a materially false statement in writing made by them to the objecting creditor for the purpose of obtaining credit; and that with intent to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Gerdes v. LustgartenSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- International Harvester Co. of America v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- In re HughesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
3Cited by94 opinions
- In Re John Houtman and Gladys Irene Houtman, Bankrupts. John Houtman and Gladys Irene Houtman v. Edgar F. Mann and Edna M. Mann, Creditors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- In the Matter of William Albert Talor, AKA William A. Taylor, Bankrupt Public Finance Corporation of Redlands v. William A. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Leeb v. Guy (In Re Guy)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
- Haney v. Copeland (In Re Copeland)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2003
- In Re Orrin C. Kreps, Jr. And Margaret W. Kreps, Debtors. First National Bank of Lansing v. Orrin C. Kreps, Jr. And Margaret W. KrepsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.