Legal Opinion

Woolen Corporation of America v. Gitnig

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 5, 1929No. 4048PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

January 25, 1928, David Gitnig and Nathan Gitnig, individually and as copartners trading as Joseph Gitnig & Sons, were adjudged bankrupts, on their own petition. The same day the bankrupts made a composition offer of 33% per cent., payable partly in cash and partly in notes. This offer was, after objection filed by the Woolen Corporation of America, enlarged to 35 per cent, payable all cash. The amended offer and objections were then referred by the District Court to a special referee, to ascertain and report the facts thereon, in accordance with section 12 of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morimura, Arai & Co. v. TabackSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Charles Moore Bardwell, Jr., Bankrupts. Highland Village Bank v. Charles Moore Bardwell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. In Re LovichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. In re FinnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  4. In the Matter of Albert M. Barbato, Bankrupt, Royal Indemnity Company, a Corporation of the State of New York, a CreditorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  5. In Re SlohmDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API