Legal Opinion

Urban v. Anderson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1940PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The first question presented by this record relates to the power of the court to modify the order of July 18th by the orders entered, respectively, on July 31 and August 24, 1939. The motion for a new trial was based upon the minutes of the judge and is authorized by sec. 270.49 (1), Stats. By that subsection it is provided:

“(1) The trial judge may entertain a motion to> be made on his minutes, tO' set aside a verdict and grant a new trial because of errors in the trial or because the verdict is contrary to law or to the evidence, or for excessive or inadequate damages or in the interest of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Heimlich v. TaborWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Beck v. WallmowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Donovan v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Wasicek v. M. Carpenter Baking Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jos. P. Jansen Co. v. Milwaukee Area District Board of Vocational, Technical & Adult EducationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. D. R. W. Corporation v. CordesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Kimball v. Antigo Building Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Volland v. McGeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Blong v. Ed. Schuster & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API