Kimball v. Antigo Building Supply Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.
Frank Goffin, a building contractor with thirty years’ experience, testified that if the house had been as represented “there would have been no trouble getting from $6,500 to $7,000” for it. In answer to the question, “You would say $6,500 would be a fair market price, fair value for that house?” he replied “Yes.” His answer to the latter question must be accepted as his opinion, for it suggests the value properly to be considered, market value. He testified that in his opinion the actual value of the house “would be $4,500. That would be top and I don’t think you could get it with those…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mueller v. MichelsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Risch v. LawheadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Calumet Auto Co. v. DinyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Goelz v. KnoblauchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Urban v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Anderson v. Tri-State Home Improvement Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Harweger v. WilcoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Krueger v. SteffenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Blong v. Ed. Schuster & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Chitwood v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.