Legal Opinion

Chin v. Bowen

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 21, 1987No. 86 Civ. 5755 (EW)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

Defendants Peter DiSturco, Regional Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”), and unknown named employees of the SSA move to dismiss the constitutional tort claim of plaintiff Kathleen Chin on the ground, inter alia, that it was not brought within the statute of limitations. At issue is whether to apply New York’s three year statute of limitations for actions based upon a liability imposed or created by a statute, 1 or the six year “catch-all” provision for causes of action for which no limitation is specifically prescribed. 2

Chin,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chin v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Chin v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. Shannon v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1993
  4. Channer v. MurrayDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API