Legal Opinion

Channer v. Murray

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 20, 2003No. 3:00CV230(SRU)WIGPublished

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS 2

UNDERHILL, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Claudious W. Channer (“Channer”), filed this civil rights action pro se pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343, 1495, 2201, 2513 and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. He alleges that defendants City of Hartford, James Markowski (“Markowski”), Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal (“Blumenthal”) and former United States Attorney General Janet Reno (“Reno”) falsely arrested and imprisoned him on federal criminal charges. Pending is a motion to dismiss filed by Markowski and Reno. Because the court has already dismissed all…

2Cases cited41 opinions

Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.