Legal Opinion

Town of Hodgenville v. Kentucky Utilities Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 23, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming.

Section 3699 of the Kentucky Statutes, being part -of the charter of cities of the sixth class, in part pro-vides:

“No ordinance or resolution granting any franchise shall be passed by the board of trustees within five days after its introduction, nor at any other than a regular meeting.”.The sole question presented by this appeal is •whether .an ordinance granting the appellee a franchise for the business of generating and selling electric current in the town of TIodgenville, appellant herein, was passed at a regular meeting of its board of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tandy & Fairleigh Tobacco Co. v. City of HopkinsvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Ralls v. WyandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Bond v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  4. United States v. DietrichU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1904
  5. Dockett v. Old Forge BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Puryear v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API