Legal Opinion

Puryear v. City of Greenville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 21, 1968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEINFELD, Judge.

Appellants, Puryear and Rice, sued the City of Greenville, its Mayor, Councilmen, *438Building Inspector, Board of Zoning Adjustments and Planning Commission to have an amendatory zoning ordinance declared void and of no effect. From a judgment holding the amendment valid and dismissing the complaint this appeal was filed. We affirm.

The City of Greenville is a municipal corporation of the fourth class. KRS 81.-010. For at least ten years before this litigation the city had some form of zoning ordinance. KRS 100.500. In June 1964 a revised zoning ordinance was adopted which…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Burnham v. Board of Appeals of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  2. Lazarus v. Village of NorthbrookIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Ex parte MirandeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Costello v. SielingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Shepard v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1910

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  2. Bell v. BellKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Johnson v. LagrewCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  4. Wilson v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014
  5. Hofgesang v. McMakinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API