Puryear v. City of Greenville
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
STEINFELD, Judge.
Appellants, Puryear and Rice, sued the City of Greenville, its Mayor, Councilmen, *438Building Inspector, Board of Zoning Adjustments and Planning Commission to have an amendatory zoning ordinance declared void and of no effect. From a judgment holding the amendment valid and dismissing the complaint this appeal was filed. We affirm.
The City of Greenville is a municipal corporation of the fourth class. KRS 81.-010. For at least ten years before this litigation the city had some form of zoning ordinance. KRS 100.500. In June 1964 a revised zoning ordinance was adopted which…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Burnham v. Board of Appeals of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Lazarus v. Village of NorthbrookIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
- Ex parte MirandeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Costello v. SielingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Shepard v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Louisville v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
- Bell v. BellKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- Johnson v. LagrewCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Wilson v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014
- Hofgesang v. McMakinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.