Legal Opinion

Tandy & Fairleigh Tobacco Co. v. City of Hopkinsville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 23, 1917PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Christian Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Miller

Affirming.

This case involves the validity of ordinances Nos. 16 and 20 of the city of Hopkinsville, a city of the third class, which imposed a license tax upon the tobacco dealers of that city.

Insofar as the ordinances are material to this case, they are identical. The appellants, who were tobacco dealers of Hopkinsville, filed their petition in equity attacking the ordinances insofar as they classified the tobacco dealers of the city for the purpose of imposing a license tax, and asked for an injunction against the collection of the tax imposed by the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hager v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Whereatt v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Fiscal Court Owen Co. v. F. & A. Cox Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. Brooks v. ManganMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. City of Mankato v. FowlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ziedman & Pollie, Inc. v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Sallsbury v. Equitable Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. City of Wilmore v. McCrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Pure Milk Producers & Distributors Ass'ns v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  5. Beavers v. City of WilliamsburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API