Dockett v. Old Forge Borough
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 26, Jan. T., 1913, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Jan. T., 1913, No. 5, on bill in equity in case of Walter Dockett and Joseph Wakelin v. Old Forge Borohgh, et al. Bill in equity for an injunction. Edwaeds, P. J., filed the following opinion: At the hearing of the rule to continue a preliminary injunction the parties agreed that a hearing be final, the case being at issue by answer and replication.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 26, Jan. T., 1913, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Jan. T., 1913, No. 5, on bill in equity in case of Walter Dockett and Joseph Wakelin v. Old Forge Borohgh, et al. Bill in equity for an injunction. Edwaeds, P. J., filed the following opinion: At the hearing of the rule to continue a preliminary injunction the parties agreed that a hearing be final, the case being at issue by answer and replication. From the evidence and the pleadings we find the following facts: 1. The council of the Borough of Old Forge entered into a contract with Mathias Stipp for the…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The decree in this case is affirmed on the legal conclusions which followed the five facts properly found by the learned president judge of the court below.
Appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Town of Hodgenville v. Kentucky Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Current Coal Contracts, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1974