Legal Opinion
Lane v. United States Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 14, 1997No. 96-3285PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAUGHREY, District Judge.
This is an appeal from the District Court’s order that Plaintiffs, Darvin and Dwight Lane (“Lanes”), are entitled to recover their attorney fees from the United States Department of Agriculture (“Agency”) pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 5 U.S.C. § 504. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
The Lanes are brothers who borrowed money through the Farmers Home Administration (“FmHA”). The FmHA denied them delinquent farmer loan servicing and the Lanes appealed to the National Appeals Division (“NAD”). The Lanes won the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Marcello v. BondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Jane Donaho v. Fmc Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, as Plan Administrator of the Fmc Long-Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Fidelity Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- St. Louis Fuel and Supply Company, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beard v. GlickmanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Dwight L. Lane Darvin R. Lane v. United States Department of Agriculture Daniel Glickman, .Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture the Farm Service Agency, of the United States Department of Agriculture Keith Kelly, Administrator of the Farm Service Agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, William G. Jenson, the Judicial Officer of the United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Lane v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Lane v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002