Legal Opinion
Beard v. Glickman
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 7, 2001No. 99-01752-GHKPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROCEEDINGS: Cross Motions for Summary Judgment
KING, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment in the form of a joint briefing ordered by the court. These motions are appropriate for resolution without oral argument. Fed. R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7.11. After fully considering the briefs and papers pertaining to this matter, we rule as follows:
I. Background
Plaintiffs Donald B. Beard and Celeste Svihovec Beard (the “Beards”) filed their original complaint on February 19, 1999. The Beards filed their Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) on May 4, 2000, in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Wanda S. FLATEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Enterprise National Bank v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- PM Farms, Inc. v. YoungDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2017