Legal Opinion

Heard v. Moore

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided March 19, 2003No. 06-02-00151-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice MORRISS.

Walterine Heard appeals a summary judgment granted to Billy Moore, The Pool Company, and Pool Energy Services Company. In two points of error, Heard contends the trial court should not have granted summary judgment in favor of Appellees because (1) res judicata does not apply to parties whose claim was severed from the case on which the final judgment was based, and (2) the trial court received no evidence regarding the accident on which Heard’s claim was based.

Factual and Procedural Background

On January 14, 1998, James Ronan Nelson and Moore were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Getty Oil Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Van Dyke v. Boswell, O'Toole, Davis & PickeringTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. P.S. v. Psychiatric Coverage, Ltd.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. MacHa, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1989

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Harding Co. v. Sendero Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. in Re: Champion Industrial Sales, Llc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2012
  3. Reed v. Rook TXTexas Business Court · 2025
  4. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
  5. Arthur J. Hopkins v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API