Legal Opinion

Reed v. Rook TX

Texas Business Court

Decided August 25, 2025No. 25-BC03A-0007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

2025 Tex. Bus. 34

The Business Court of Texas, Third Division JERRY B. REED, § § Plaintiff, § v. § Cause No. 25-BC03A-0007 § ROOK TX, LP, et al., § Defendants. § § ═══════════════════════════════════════ Syllabus * ═══════════════════════════════════════ On a renewed motion to remand, the Court holds that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over the action as pleaded in the plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Petition and remands the case. The Court concludes that it (a) cannot exercise supplemental jurisdiction because the plaintiff never agreed that the action could proceed in this Court; (b) does…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Continental Coffee Products Co. v. CazarezTexas Supreme Court · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. HerreraTexas Business Court · 2025
  2. Clean-Co Systems v. Enterprise Products OperatingTexas Business Court · 2026
  3. In Re ColossusBets Limited v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API