Legal Opinion
Glencore Ltd. v. Degussa Engineered Carbons L.P.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 24, 2012No. 11 Civ. 7153(PAE)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge.
This decision resolves a motion to compel arbitration. The Court holds that the dispute between Petitioner Glencore Ltd. (“Glencore”) and Respondent Degussa Engineered Carbons L.P. a/k/a Evonik Carbon Black L.L.C. (“Evonik”), and Evonik’s insurer, HDI-Gerling America Insurance Co. (“HDI”), is subject to a binding arbitration provision enforceable under the standards set out in Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 201-208. The Court further holds that it has personal jurisdiction over Evonik. The Court therefore grants…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ge Dandong v. Pinnacle Performance Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Production Resource Group, L.L.C. v. Martin Professional, A/SDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Crewe v. Rich Dad Education, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Pagaduan v. Carnival Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Variblend Dual Dispensing System, LLC v. Seidel Gmbh & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.