Legal Opinion
Crewe v. Rich Dad Education, LLC
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 3, 2012No. 11 Civ. 8301)(PAE)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:
Robert Crewe and Robert Maurice, the plaintiffs in this putative class action, bring various state law claims against corporate defendants Rich Dad Education, LLC (“RDE”), Rich Dad Operating Co., LLC (“RDO”), Rich Global, LLC (“RG”), Cash-flow Technologies, Inc., Tigrent Inc. (“IT”), Tigrent Learning Inc. (“TLI”), and Tigrent Brands Inc. (“TBI”), and individual defendants Robert Kiyosaki, Christopher Briggs, Scott Stewart, Marc Hrisko, Wayne Morgan, and John Does 1 through 50 (collectively, “defendants”). In essence, plaintiffs allege that…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kai Peng v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Khanom v. KerryDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- In re Facebook, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Saizhang Guan v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Hart v. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.