Legal Opinion
Variblend Dual Dispensing System, LLC v. Seidel Gmbh & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 27, 2013No. 13 Civ. 2597(PAE)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:
Plaintiff Variblend Dual Dispensing Systems, LLC (“Variblend”) sues defendant Seidel GmbH & Co. KG (“Seidel”) for alleged tortious conduct regarding proprietary trade secrets previously licensed to Seidel by Innopump, Inc., d/b/a Versadial (‘Versadial”), a non-party to this action. Variblend alleges that it is the assignee of Versadial’s rights under its agreement with Seidel. Seidel moves to dismiss this action and to compel arbitration in Geneva, Switzerland, in accordance with the arbitration provision contained in the agreement between…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Drennen v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London (In re Residential Capital, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Fontaine v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.District Court, W.D. New York · 2021
- Vitrano v. N.A.R., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020