Legal Opinion

Emon Enterprises, LLC v. Kilcup

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 17, 2017No. FE150196; A159316PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLYNN, J. pro tempore

In this forcible entry and detainer (FED) action, tenant appeals a judgment of restitution of the premises to landlord. The issue presented in this appeal is whether tenant engaged in conduct that could be considered “outrageous in the extreme” so as to permit landlord to terminate the tenancy on an expedited basis under ORS 90.396(1)(f). For the reasons that follow, we agree with tenant that his conduct did not qualify as “outrageous in the extreme,” within the meaning of ORS 90.396(1)(f). Accordingly, we reverse the restitution judgment.1

The facts pertinent to this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. McDowell v. Employment DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Schmidt v. Mt. Angel AbbeyOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Padrick v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Forward v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Emon Enters., LLC v. KilcupCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API