Legal Opinion

Forward v. Graham

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 2, 2017No. 15LT09162; A160851PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.

Plaintiff landlord appeals a judgment in favor of defendants, who are tenants in plaintiffs apartment building. After one of defendants physically attacked another resident, plaintiff served defendants with a notice of termination on an expedited basis under ORS 90.396 (also known as a 24-hour eviction) and commenced a forcible entry and detainer (FED) proceeding. The trial court concluded that plaintiff could not avail itself of an expedited eviction under the statute. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the trial court’s ruling was based on a legal error, and we reverse and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Williams v. SALEM WOMEN'S CLINICCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Reach Community Development v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Emon Enterprises, LLC v. KilcupCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lopez v. KilbourneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API