Elcome v. Chin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff sued two doctors and a hospital for medical malpractice. The trial court granted separate motions for summary judgment in favor of one of the doctors, Michael Chin, M.D., and the hospital, Tenet Healthsystem Heritage, Inc., doing business as Rancho Springs Medical Center (Tenet). The other defendant doctor, Tien Gu, M.D., is not a party to this appeal.
Plaintiff appeals from the judgments entered in favor of Dr. Chin and Tenet. She contends that the trial court did not properly apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in ruling on the motions for summary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Kids' Universe v. In2labsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- United Community Church v. GarcinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Deveny v. ENTROPIN, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Amerus Life Insurance v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Tilley v. CZ MASTER ASS'NCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- (PS) Manning v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Bruce Gero v. United States GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.