Legal Opinion
Guide v. Desperak
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 30, 1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
Nature of the actions
These are two actions alleging patent infringment and unfair competition which have been consolidated for trial. Both actions are based upon patent No. 2,674,963 issued to the plaintiff on April 13,1954 entitled "Spiral Seam Producing Mechanism for Sewing Machines”. The defendants in both actions have pleaded that plaintiff’s patent is invalid, and the individual defendants have counterclaimed for a judgment that the patent in suit be declared invalid. The individual defendant Rosehko also filed a counterclaim in which he asked that the plaintiff be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Evans v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Axel Harald Holstensson v. V-M CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Milton E. Dam and Everett S. Dam, Co-Partners Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Dam Brothers v. General Electric Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Guide v. DesperakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Hardinge Company, Inc. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- George P. Converse & Co. v. Thomas J. Lipton, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.