Cosgrove v. Fogg
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtMurchie, J.
The plaintiff brings this case forward on a general motion for new trial wherein the only allegation relied on is that the damages awarded by the jury are inadequate. That this furnishes ground for the relief sought in this jurisdiction is well established when a jury has been influenced by passion, bias or prejudice, or has disregarded evidence. Leavitt v. Dow, 105 Me. 50, 72 A. 735, 134 Am. St. Rep. 534, 17 Ann. Cas. 1072; Conroy v. Reid, 132 Me. 162, 168 A. 215. The principle is recognized in other jurisdic*465tions. See Benton v. Collins, 125 N. C. 83, 34 S. E. 242, 47 L. R. A. 33; 39 Am.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Benton v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Sundgren v. StevensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Leavitt v. DowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
- Conroy v. ReidSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chenell v. Westbrook CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Pettengill v. TuroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
- MacLean v. JackSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964
- Roy v. HuardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961