Legal Opinion

Conroy v. Reid

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 6, 1933PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

These general motions by the plaintiffs involve only the adequacy of the damages assessed by the jury. The other grounds for new trials, which were originally assigned, have been abandoned. The defendant did not file cross motions.

On August 6, 1932, Alice Conroy and Angeline Lee and the latter’s intestate, Albert Morrisette, were injured when the automobile in which they were riding as passengers collided with a Lincoln touring car driven by the defendant. In each of these actions to recover the damages resulting from the collision, the plaintiff has a verdict.

There is very little, if any,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coombs v. KingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910
  2. Whitney v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Leavitt v. DowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Michaud v. SteckinoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. Franco v. FujimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Chatelain v. ThackerayUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Chenell v. Westbrook CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  5. Cope v. SevignySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API