Roy v. Huard
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtWebber, J.
In this case both plaintiff and defendant appeal from a judgment, the plaintiff on the ground that damages fixed by the jury were inadequate, and the defendant because as he avers he has incurred no liability to plaintiff. The essential facts are not in dispute and may be briefly stated.
Plaintiff, a real estate broker, was authorized in writing by the defendant to undertake the sale of the latter’s home for an agreed commission of five per cent of the sale price “whether or not the sale price is the original asking price.” The asking price ag-reed upon was $14,700. The agreement executed by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Hamlin v. SchulteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Labbe v. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- Campbell v. Campbell Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Hensley Insurance Co. v. EcholsSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McHugh v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Perkins v. WillacyAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
- Pepper v. ChatelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- Perkins v. WillacyAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
- Perry v. MacArthurSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976