Legal Opinion

Dunnett v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 30, 1938No. 28862PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, C. J.

Raymond Murray Dun-nett, Annabel Agreci, formerly Annabel Dunnett, and Daniel Raymond Dunnett filed suit against the First National Bank & Trust Company, a corporation, trustee, m the district court of Tulsa county seeking to revoke and dissolve a certain trust agreement. Under the terms of the trust, Raymond Murray Dunnett and Annabel Dun-nett, now Agreci, formerly husband and wife, settlors, are life beneficiaries, their only child, Daniel Raymond Dunnett, is the other present beneficiary, and the First National Bank & Trust Company is the trustee. The trial court refused to dissolve the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Doctor v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Schoellkopf v. Marine Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Dodson v. BallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  4. Alexander v. de KermelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883
  5. McKnight v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. DANI v. MILLERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  2. Crutcher v. JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  3. Bixby v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Hurst v. KravisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. In Re the Testamentary Trust Created by the Last Will & Testament of DimickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API