Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Kravis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 16, 1958No. 38477PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

This is a suit brought by the plaintiffs, Raymond F. Kravis, Louis P. Myers, and the National Bank of Tulsa, as, co-trustees, in each of six identical trust agreements for the purpose of having the District Court construe portions thereof pursuant to the Oklahoma Trust Act, Title 60 0.S$.1951 § 175.23, and for reformation. The defendants were H. P. Taubman and his wife, Sophia Taubman, settlors, and their six adult children, they being the only persons beneficially interested therein, and the set-tlors' eleven minor grandchildren, being all the children of settlors' six adult…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harrison v. EavesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Dunnett v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Dowell v. McNeillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. DANI v. MILLERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  2. Cavett v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Trust Co. of Oklahoma v. State Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. In Re the Testamentary Trust Created by the Last Will & Testament of DimickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API