Legal Opinion

Goldman Ex Rel. Goldman-Wilson v. Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1992No. 18326PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Former District Judge Paul S. Goldman appeals from the final report, findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment of the Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline (the commission). Following formal proceedings, the commission found that appellant: (1) had voluntarily abandoned and relinquished his office; (2) had engaged in willfiil misconduct and habitual intemperance, unexcused by any claimed physical or mental disability; and (3) was not and had not been permanently disabled physically or mentally to perform the duties of his office in the sense contemplated by the Nevada…

3Cases cited53 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Galloway v. TruesdellNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Matter of SheffieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by29 opinions

  1. Tony Duckett v. Salvador Godinez Brian McKayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. In Re WorthenUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Halverson v. HardcastleNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Whitehead v. Nevada Commission on Judicial DisciplineNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Whitehead v. Nevada Commission on Judicial DisciplineNevada Supreme Court · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API