Legal Opinion

Kulik v. Albers Incorporated

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1975No. 7542PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Zenoff, J.:

The respondent, Albers Incorporated, became a creditor of William F. and Jo Ann Belden for feed sold the Beldens for their cows. The Beldens had purchased a ranch including equipment and the cows from H. A. and Gloria Kulik. They executed a security instrument for the balance of the purchase price. Neither the agreement nor any financing statement was filed as provided in the Uniform Commercial Code. NRS 104.-9302.

Kulik advised the respondent of the sale in a casual conversation but did not reveal the title retention agreement. Respondent proceeded to sell feed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Levine v. PascalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  2. Fletcher v. FletcherNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Wantz v. RedfieldNevada Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Central Penn National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Mann v. Clark Oil & Refining CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ninth District Production Credit Ass'n v. Ed Duggan, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Holland Livestock Ranch v. B & C ENTERPRISESNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Alves v. BumguardnerNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Home Savings Ass'n v. General Electric Credit Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Brooksby v. Nevada State BankNevada Supreme Court · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API