Legal Opinion

Singley v. Bigelow

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1930No. Docket No. 3989PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE PLUMMER Delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Plaintiffs, as husband and wife, began this action against the defendant to recover damages in the sum of $15,565.15, alleged to be due from the estate of said deceased for and on account of injuries suffered by the said Nettie S. Singley, and certain incidental expenses, as hereinafter stated.

After alleging the relationship of the plaintiffs, the complaint sets forth that prior to his death, and on the twenty-first day of January, 1929, Justin O. Bigelow, now deceased, was conducting a drug-store in the town of Tuolumne; that at said…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Conklin v. DraperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Boor v. LowreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Wikstrom v. Yolo Fliers ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Basler v. Sacramento Elec., Gas & Ry.California Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Goble v. DillonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. Anchor Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Eads v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hunt v. AuthierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Rubino v. Utah Canning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Kershaw v. TilburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API