Slicer v. State

1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the indictment.(a) The indictment charged the statutory offense created by the banking act of 1919 (Ga. Laws 1919, at p. 216). The indictment was not de*446murrable on the ground that it charged several distinct offenses in the same count. Under the statute creating the offense, all of the different ways therein stated, by which one might commit the offense, can be charged in one and the same count. The Penal Code (1910), § 954, provides: “Every indictment or accusation of the grand jury shall be deemed sufficiently technical and correct,…