Legal Opinion

Slaughter v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 9, 1959No. 37575PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Judge.

The main contention of the plaintiff in error, as raised by the demurrers to the indictment, the motion for new trial, and also the motion in arrest of judgment is, in substance, that the substantive offense of bribery, a felony, cannot be consummated singularly but must be the result of at least two participating offenders, the giver and the receiver of the bribe; that in such event both giver and receiver are accomplices and the bribe-giver cannot be convicted only upon the uncorroborated testimony of such accomplices; that a charge of offering to bribe is not a charge of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Slicer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McKibben v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Whitfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Kenerly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. Kevin Russell Kenerly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API