Commonwealth v. Verdekal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
William Verdekal, appellant, was found guilty of robbery and theft by unlawful taking following a jury trial. In his appeal, appellant presents six issues for appellate review: (1) whether the motion to supress appellant’s identification by the victims was properly denied; (2) whether the appellant was placed in double jeopardy when the court declared a mistrial and he was subsequently retried; (3) whether it was error to allow the jury to have certain physical evidence with them during their deliberations; (4) whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Commonwealth v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Commonwealth v. QuilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. SattazahnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. ManchasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. AkersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.